Jacob Boyko / South Dakota News Watch
MADISON, S.D. – South Dakota keeps adding video lottery machines, with 567 more terminals and over $1.17 billion gambled this year, earning a record-setting $163 million in revenue for the state.
As the games continue their sprawl and the Legislature weighs an increase in betting limits, some South Dakota communities are trying to figure out a middle-of-the-road solution for the future of the 34-year-old games.
Rapid City, Aberdeen, Mitchell, Watertown, Yankton, and most recently Sioux Falls and Brookings, all have caps on video lottery licenses within city limits.
“The issue got to be that we were concerned with the growth of the casinos and I don’t think anybody in the beginning had envisioned that as what we’d have in Brookings,” City Councilor Wayne Avery told News Watch. “That we’d turn into a gambling center and have casinos in so many places.”
Brookings passed its ordinance in July, capping licenses at 30 for its 26,377 residents, with one new license available for each 1,000 people added to the population.
“We weren’t trying to stamp out crime or eliminate anybody’s business opportunities,” Avery said. “There was a feeling people on the council had. … There had to be a point where we said ‘enough is enough.'”
Sioux Falls capped video lottery licenses at 186 last year for its 202,600 population, and there won’t be more licenses until the population increases by 5,000 people.
“When you look at the intent when video lottery started, it was intended to be a supplement, like you’d have a restaurant with video lottery machines there,” Sioux Falls City Councilor Rich Merkouris told News Watch. “It’s kind of turned into stand-alone casinos.”
The video lottery loophole in Yankton
Yankton is the latest city looking to reform its video lottery regulations after city commissioners were made aware that the current ordinance violates state law.
For an establishment to obtain a video lottery license, it must have a malt beverage, wine or liquor license. However, the City of Yankton only has jurisdiction over video lottery licenses attached to malt beverage and wine licenses, meaning liquor license holders can add a video lottery endorsement without city approval.
Yankton’s cap, which is currently 39, will need to be lowered to 34 to align “with the existing number of retail malt beverage or wine issued licenses,” city attorney Ross Den Herder said to the city commission at a Nov. 27 meeting.
James Grotenhuis, owner of The Fox Stop convenience store in Yankton, made the case to the city commission that the current ordinance allows for multiple new licenses because the city doesn’t technically have jurisdiction over all 39 allowed licenses.
Grotenhuis told the commission he has to rent a license and share the profit because of the city’s cap. He asked the commission to approve a video lottery license for his business, but he was denied.
Yankton commissioners must now find a path forward for video lottery that balances needs of new and expanding businesses, current license holders and the community at large.
Den Herder told commissioners the city’s cap has raised the market value of a malt beverage license with video lottery endorsement to about $150,000. Some commissioners worry that lifting the cap or allowing more licenses will devalue business owners’ licenses.
“How do we protect that value for current endorsement holders who’ve spent well over $100,000 for their endorsements but still provide opportunity for the little guy?” Commissioner Mason Schramm asked.
Grotenhuis said to News Watch that video lottery can be vital for some smaller businesses’ bottom lines.
“Not all ordinances stand the test of time,” he said. ” I think it’s healthy to look at the ordinances from time to time to make sure they’re still meeting the goals of the commission as the years go by.”
At the Nov. 27 meeting, City Commissioner Ben Brunick suggested a cap that adjusts for population increases like the Sioux Falls and Brookings ordinances. But he was cautioned by Herder about unused video lottery endorsements attached to liquor licenses that could be “turned on” and increase the number of machines by dozens.
“I don’t think we need any more machines than we already have,” City Commissioner Brian Humhoff told News Watch. “We’re already a city with 350 machines and a potential to get 400 without doing anything.”
Video lottery makes up 91% of state’s lottery revenue
The South Dakota Lottery’s 2023 report reveals the state made a combined total of over $178.2 million from instant tickets, lotto tickets and video lottery.
Video lottery made up over $163 million, or about 91% of the total lottery revenue, with an average of 10,231 active machines in an average of 1,326 establishments.
A license grants an establishment the option to have up to 10 video lottery terminals, though some locations can obtain multiple licenses by sectioning off groups of machines.
The state took 49.5% of the terminals’ $329.4 million net machine income and applied 70% of it to the general fund to support K-12 schools, universities and technical institutes, according to the South Dakota Lottery’s fiscal year 2023 report.
The remaining 30% of the net revenue goes to the Capital Construction Fund, of which 64% goes to the Water and Environment Fund to support drinking water and wastewater projects and natural resource development. The other 36% of the fund goes to the State Highway Fund to support highways and bridges.
Just $214,000 goes to the Department of Social Services to support problem gamblers, an amount District 8 Sen. John Mills of Brookings said has been static for years.
North Dakota, which doesn’t have video lottery, reported revenue of $11.28 million from its lottery in fiscal year 2023. The state’s contribution to its compulsive gambling treatment fund is $320,000.
Some legislators want to increase betting limit
Legislators are split on the future of video lottery in South Dakota.
District 28 Sen. Ryan Maher of Isabel introduced SB-117 last year to increase the video lottery betting limit from $2 to $4 and increase the jackpot from $1,000 to $2,500, which he said was meant to keep video lottery sustainable.
“Essentially what it was doing was trying to help the retailers offset some of their costs to have video lottery and to help retailers in that industry pay for employees,” Maher told News Watch. “Our minimum wage keeps going up every year and the cost of electricity isn’t going down and the cost of propane isn’t going down.”
The bill failed in the Senate on a 18-17 vote, but Maher expects another attempt to raise the limits at the upcoming session.
District 16 Sen. Jim Bolin of Canton opposed last year’s bill, telling News Watch while he doesn’t oppose video lottery and respects voters’ decision on it, an expansion could have social consequences.
“I suppose it would generate more money, but it would also very likely impoverish more people,” Bolin said.
Video lottery repeals have fallen short in elections
South Dakotans have voted four times to keep video lottery since its establishment in 1989. The most recent measure to repeal video lottery in 2006 failed 67% to 33%.
Mills said gambling is a net-loss to governments because of the increase of crime, social welfare and other consequences of addiction.
“For every dollar the government takes from gambling enterprise, $3 are lost,” Mills said. “The state government gets all of the money, but the negative impacts all happen at the local level.”
South Dakota is one of the few states to offer video gambling. Others include Montana, Delaware, Illinois, Louisiana, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, West Virginia and Georgia.
“It’s very limited because I think it’s very recognizable how damaging it is,” Mills said. “It’s just terrible that we fund government off of peoples’ addictions and then promote it on top of that.”
Video lottery addictive by nature and tied to meth
Addiction experts say video lottery is the most addictive form of gambling due to the fast-paced nature of the games and the easy accessibility.
“The fact that there’s so many machines in so many non-gaming locations means you come across machines all the time,” said Keith Whyte, executive director for the National Council on Problem Gambling. “It’s not like you’re going specifically to gamble. You may be going to get groceries or to do other activities, and the machines are there as well.”
Matt Walz, medical affairs specialist at Keystone Treatment Center in Sioux Falls, told News Watch that video lottery gambling and addiction is often related to other forms of addiction.
“There is a relationship right now in South Dakota between gambling and meth,” Walz said. “We’ve had more treatment than ever now for meth addiction, and when we have meth patients, we ask them where they bought their meth. No. 1 answer the last few years has been at the casino … typically the video lottery casinos.”
According to Walz, video lottery gambling addiction also brings risk for theft, burglary, embezzlement and suicide.
“It’s important to know that people with a gambling disorder or compulsive gambling disorder have the highest rate of suicide of any addiction by a long shot,” he said. “It’s rare for us to treat a patient who has not attempted suicide. We regularly treat patients who have attempted suicide multiple times.”
South Dakota News Watch interviewed a self-described compulsive video gambler in Madison. He said he started playing about 10 years ago out of curiosity and that it quickly got out of hand.
“Watching the screen, it’s an attraction,” the gambler said. “It draws you with the sounds it makes. There’s sounds for running out of money, sounds for losing, the buffalo that roar, the little fishy that makes a noise. They attract you, and they play on that to try and keep you there.”
The gambler said he’d spend hours in the video lottery casinos playing on the machines.
“You can go from recreational use to problem in a short amount of time,” Whyte said. “Some of it has to do with the almost hypnotic nature of being able to play continuously. Many people report being in a trance-like state. It’s almost like a narcotic.”
The gambler said even when he’d win money gambling, he’d often continue playing until he had nothing left anyway.
“The next morning you wake up and just feel sick with yourself,” he said. “If you buy drills or you buy a saw or something you really want, you’ll keep that and you won’t lose that money again.”
The gambler said his breaking point came when he started writing bad checks to fund his addiction.
Walz said impacts like this are not taken into account by governments when they measure the costs and benefits of video lottery gambling.
“In terms of business ethics and business sense, it’s always important to understand what are your revenues, which we do,” Walz said. “But I don’t think we know, as we would in most businesses, the expenses and costs. In South Dakota, I don’t know we do such a great job of measuring and articulating the cost of video lottery.”
Josh Linehan, managing editor of The Brookings Register, contributed to this report.